I am talking about the Muse, I suppose, who can be considered a kind of tutelary demon of writing. Although I love writing, some days it seems like hard work, and I strain to produce one word, one sentence that has any life. At other times, it just flows, and I am possessed – by the story, by the characters.
So I am still considering the ideas about creativity discussed in the Jonah Lehrer book, Imagine – which I have talked about here before.
In the first couple of chapters he uses two examples to illustrate what he sees as different forms of creativity. The first is Bob Dylan. He describes the time when Dylan was creatively blocked and retreated from the music world, determined to give up writing. He was tired and stale. But after a few days in retreat, he was overcome with a compulsive need to write. In Dylan’s words “I found myself writing this song, this story, this long piece of vomit, twenty pages long” – the song that was to become one his most well known, Like a Rolling Stone.
“Vomit” Lehrer suggests, is the key word here. This kind of creativity is like a force of nature, it simply spews up from the unconscious mind – a stream of images that make the same kind of sense that dreams do. Intuition and emotion are needed to grasp them, much more than reason.
The other example, of a different kind of creativity, is the poet W H Auden. His approach was very different, and was more focused – to the extent that he turned to drugs like speed – Benzedrine – to turn him into a “writing machine.” Lehrer explains the science behind how this particular drug works – check the book out if you are interested. So this focus is what allowed Auden to concentrate for hours and perfect every word, every syllable of his poetry.
What interests me, is that these two examples seem to me to represent stages in the creative process – and both stages are surely always necessary. It can be understood by the concept of right brain and left brain – vomit and focus in Lehrer’s examples.
I think in writing fiction, these are for me two necessary stages. And one process comes to me much more easily than the other.
I’ve never had much difficulty (at least not until the current medication) in concentrating on what I’m doing, for extended periods of time. As a writer, I’ve always loved the editing phase. I like considering the structure of the story, and of the sentences. I don’t mind taking out huge chunks and adding new scenes.
For me the blank page, the first draft – that is what is so difficult for me. That’s the part of the process that does not come easily.
But when it does come, it is exciting. It happened when I was writing the first draft of my novel – when I was writing every day and pushing myself to do it without an outline – there was no safety net.
For the first time I found that my characters did run away and create a story apparently without my conscious help. All the way through I was fretting about one particular character. I had mentioned her in several places, and yet I had no idea why I needed her or what she was doing. I kept telling myself that it was okay – that I could edit her out later. But right at the turning point of the book there she was – she turned up in Eastbourne living under a fake name and working in a nursing home.
I’ve read a great deal about writing and I know a lot of writers object to this idea – you cannot let your characters run away and do their own thing. It is up to the writer to stay in control of the story. Of course, that is true – but what I found to my surprise and delight, was that the unconscious writer had more ideas about how to create an exciting story than the conscious one.
Of course, the next stage of the process, editing and rewriting, also has to do a bit of work to tidy up after the unconscious vomit. I guess even Bob Dylan did a fair bit of judicious pruning – if he cut down twenty pages of vomit, to the eloquent elegance of Like a Rolling Stone. And Auden must have faced the blank page, or he would not have had a rough draft to polish.
Still, here I am writing the second novel, and I have yet to get to the point where it all starts to flow. That first draft is still causing me problems. But a week ago, I had a moment where it all seemed to work again, and I rewrote five hundred words of prologue. Now all I need to do is write eighty to a hundred thousand more….
This way of looking at the creative process works for me, although I am sure that others would disagree. I just wish I knew a way to become completely possessed by the characters in my work in progress… There’s nothing feels quite like it, except perhaps the rush of being in love – and your characters are always there for you.
Image of Bob Dylan borrowed with thanks from Wikipedia.






This “vomit” that Lehrer suggests and your use of “spew”, Ann, has been nagging away at me – because I remember somebody else using the word “spew” acouple of months ago, or so. Thought I’d share it here.
In this case it wasn’t creative blocks per se, more life blocks, and the question it was suggested you should ask was either:
“What are you experiencing that you’d like to allow to pass?” or
“What are you not experiencing that you’d like to allow to come”?
Then the advice was to just spew it out. Don’t analyse. Just see what comes out. It veered off in another direction afterwards but it struck me that it did similar duty in the opening of the flood gates to kick off with.
(dofollow)
Linda Mattacks lovingly typed…Is it really any tougher for women in business?
Twitter: Linda_Mattacks
Ha, I like it Linda.
I think the word is espeically useful because it reminds me that it doesn’t need to be perfect, but just as it is….and it can always be analysed and edited later.
I think we do tend to second guess ourselves too often – and need to be encouraged to shut that left brain up with it’s constant analytical nagging, which tends to kill off anything that breathes life.
Ewww! Analysing your puke? Carrots and sweetcorn anyone? No, I actually like the idea of vomit and focus. I will have to read his book next. I am currently working through ‘The Artist’s Way’ by Julia Cameron. I know you did not appreciate her book as much Ann; I’m guessing due to all the God references. She’s also a bit melodramatic at times using metaphors like miscarriage, sexual harassment and emotional incest but generally I am finding it useful. I like the morning pages, which involves regularly writing a stream of consciousness. I guess it is like vomiting as it brings up thoughts from your subconscious without you controlling or editing them. I have been using some of these spewed ideas in my painting, which I am trying to get into the habit of doing.
I have two sides to my writing. Days where I vomit and then weeks where I am disciplined. BUT. I can only write when I have sufficient intake. I must balance the output with input – almost any input will do. I can read, use audio books, listen to the radio (TV doesn’t work)and I will be very discplined, I tell the Muse to be here, at 9.15 sharp and she arrives.
No input = no muse = vomit all over the place, and I don’t even write fiction
(well I have on 4 occassions, it’s been interestingly received, seems like people can’t tell it from fact. Grrrr.)
Sarah Arrow lovingly typed…What does your ideal customer look like?
Twitter: saraharrow
Oooh, can’t tell it from fact isn’t a Grrrr, it’s a compliment, Sarah! Mind, I do hope no one really believes I am anything like my heroine…
I think most people do actually write both ways, that both are necessary. And I agree with you about the need for inspiration too.
I wonder – which do you think is better, of your writing? Which comes alive more – the vomit or the disciplined? In my novel the two scenes I love the most just arrived out of nowhere… pure vomit. But they wouldn’t work without the more disciplined scaffolding I built around them.
I think the vomit is more interesting to me, as I want to pick it apart and do things with it. The disciplined stuff though it what gets the interaction – 80% of the time. Probably because I publish more of that and less of the vomit
Perhaps. More than likely I am projecting something onto it rather than accepting it’s just fiction; it doesn’t matter what people believe so long as you have evoked an emotion and got a reaction. Or perhaps I have got better at it in the 5 years I have been blogging
Twitter: saraharrow
Well, I’d like to read your fiction sometime. I suspect that most fiction that works contains a germ of emotion that is true, even if we have cleverly dressed it up in fictional clothes.
I do hope you keep the “vomit” – you might find that it does stimulate some interesting work later. I was amazed when I found some old writing journals of mine, from thirty years ago, that one of my best stories was developed from an idea I had back then….it just took thirty years for me to learn how to write it!