It’s not just about ability. It’s also about culture and performance at work.
The whole recruiting process can be daunting but at the end of the day, the most important result is that you find the right person for the role.
You check experience, past work history and you ask questions. The candidates interviews well and you’re pretty confident they could do the job. However, do you really understand what makes them tick?
Do you know what makes one candidate stand out from the rest?
For me the easy answer is to recommend Psychometric Testing. And of course I would suggest that you assess all your candidates. The added value that reports give you makes the recruitment process more reliable and less likely that your chosen candidate will leave you after a short time.
Not only can you test the ability and aptitude of candidates, which give you an idea of how a candidate might perform and what their potential for development is but you can also identify motives, talents, preferred culture and competency potential. These results will transform your business along with your recruitment strategy.
One of my colleagues worked at a large independent recruitment agency and after the initial interview, candidates had to take an ‘Agency’ test which looked at compatibility with the company. If candidates got less than 75% [no matter how 'good' they were] they didn’t get the job.
Of course, then there were a few complaints about whether it was fair or not, and it was decided that one division would no longer use the ‘Agency‘ test. Low and behold a year later the new people who hadn’t taken the test had committed a wide-scale fraud. Although the candidates were good, they were not ‘company’ people and had a number of serious behaviour issues which could have been identified early in the recruitment process which would have more than likely avoided the financial and fraudulent fall out.
Naturally there may well always be candidates that have a tendency to be unethical, dishonest or lack integrity, and in some sectors there are unimportant characteristics. However if your business is dependent on such behaviours shouldn’t you be ‘testing’ your prospective employees to weed out any traits that are not in synergy with your company?
One of the assessments I use is by Saville Consulting and is dedicated to assessment on a multi-dimensional basis. The interesting new range of aptitude assessments provides detailed measures of actual capability and the radically designed self-report questionnaires measure motives and talents, powerfully linked by our recent research, to preferred culture and competency at work. Taking into account both the commercial objectives and the culture in which people operate, it is possible to build stronger predictions of success and more comprehensive measures of compatibility within the workplace.
Some of the benefits are:
And this makes for more effectiveness in the workplace, sustainable retention and improved talent management. Raise your bottom line, avoid costly mistakes and test your candidates.
http://assessment4potential.tel/
Review of: Cousin Alice Jazz Music by Cousin Alice: Elaine Sturgess Reviewed by: Elaine Sturgess Rating: 5 On January 21, 2012 Last modified: January 30, 2012 Summary: What makes Alice so distinctive is her wonderfully smokey voice, a quality that furniture designer William Yeoward found so arresting at a concert she was performing for the [...]
Hi Lynn
This makes me think of 2 things:
First, I once worked for a company where the 3 Directors had built the business together over 17 years before one of them quietly bled the company dry and absconded with a few £million and his family, never to be seen again… The two other directors were meanwhile left carrying the can – a company going into administration and all employees suddenly and rudely out of a job…
I guess there isn't a psychometric test you can get company directors to take???
Second (and I have nothing to prove this) I believe the best employee would be one who didn't need to work. They wouldn't worry about telling the boss what s/he wanted to hear as opposed to giving their honest opinion/ feedback, would have no need to play politics; they'd be there because they wanted to not because they had to; they'd take their salary and any bonuses as their due; they wouldn't allow themselves to be walked over:
I'd love to try it out!
Twitter: comfort_selling
Sadly these qualities here are very human qualities.
I have always asked what insurance an employer has against the stupidity or maliciousness of employees. 2007 was a tough year for us, it saw us in tribunals, we had watertight policies and won every single time, looking back I wonder if these kind of tests would have weeded these people out, the ones that want to blame the employer for their own stupidity in the work place.
There are some robust and valid tests for entrepreneurial bosses and directors – and ones that look at integrity and honesty which can identify unsrupulous persons. Be warned.
Sarah, there are a range of tests which can weed out characteristics that are not sympathetically aligned to corporate values. If you'd like me to give you more info – I will!